Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 29 Apr 2015 10:38:18 -0400 | From | Rik van Riel <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] sched, timer: Use atomics in thread_group_cputimer to improve scalability |
| |
On 04/28/2015 04:00 PM, Jason Low wrote: > While running a database workload, we found a scalability issue with itimers. > > Much of the problem was caused by the thread_group_cputimer spinlock. > Each time we account for group system/user time, we need to obtain a > thread_group_cputimer's spinlock to update the timers. On larger systems > (such as a 16 socket machine), this caused more than 30% of total time > spent trying to obtain this kernel lock to update these group timer stats. > > This patch converts the timers to 64 bit atomic variables and use > atomic add to update them without a lock. With this patch, the percent > of total time spent updating thread group cputimer timers was reduced > from 30% down to less than 1%. > > Note: On 32 bit systems using the generic 64 bit atomics, this causes > sample_group_cputimer() to take locks 3 times instead of just 1 time. > However, we tested this patch on a 32 bit system ARM system using the > generic atomics and did not find the overhead to be much of an issue. > An explanation for why this isn't an issue is that 32 bit systems usually > have small numbers of CPUs, and cacheline contention from extra spinlocks > called periodically is not really apparent on smaller systems.
I don't see 32 bit systems ever getting so many CPUs that this becomes an issue :)
> Signed-off-by: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
| |