lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Apr]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 16/20] sched/idle: Use explicit broadcast oneshot control function


On 28/04/15 11:34, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 04/28/2015 12:11 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 12:22 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki
>> <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote:
>>
>>> From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>>>
>>> Replace the clockevents_notify() call with an explicit function
>>> call.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>>> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>>
>> For some reason this makes my Ux500 system arbitrarily hang,
>> especially during boot. Bisected down to this commit. Since the
>> entire changeset is removing the notifications altogether I can't
>> just revert it.
>>
>> Disabling CONFIG_CPU_IDLE removes the problem.
>>
>> Tried registering a stub driver (I just #if 0 all the code in
>> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-ux500.c) it still crashes.
>>
>> That makes me think something inside the cpuidle subsystem is
>> locking up after this, but my other idea is that the timer may be
>> involved in some way, like this is stressing the timer in some new
>> yet untested way.
>>
>> Has anyone else seen problems with this or is it only ux500?
>>
>> I'm looking closer at it but feel a bit clueless...
>
> If you keep the #if 0 and remove the CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIMER_STOP flag,
> does it still crash ?
>

At-least I observed issue only when I am using hardware broadcast timer.
It doesn't hang when I am using hrtimer as broadcast timer in which case
one of the cpu will be not enter deeper idle states that lose timer.
I will rerun on v4.1-rc1 and post the complete log.

Regards,
Sudeep


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-04-28 13:21    [W:0.114 / U:0.084 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site