Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 27 Apr 2015 19:49:06 +0200 | From | Jiri Olsa <> | Subject | Re: arm/arm64 perf build issue with mainline |
| |
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 02:40:17PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 11:13:02AM -0600, David Ahern escreveu: > > On 4/27/15 10:26 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > >Em Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 11:21:54AM -0600, David Ahern escreveu: > > >>On 4/24/15 10:22 AM, Will Deacon wrote: > > >>>I don't have a SPARC machine to hand, but we could check that the character > > >>>immediately following "CPU" is a number [0-9]. > > >> > > >>I have access to 1 or 2 or ... > > >> > > >>Yes, it needs start with CPU and be all caps (there are other Cpu lines) and > > >>a cpu number follows: > > >> > > >>CPU0: online > > >>CPU1: online > > >>CPU2: online > > >>CPU3: online > > >>... > > > > > >Ok, any progress here? > > > > I think the right thing to do is to remove JOBS completely. > > That is up for discussion, Ingo, Jiri, Namhyung, others? > > > Barring that use of getconf with a fallback to grepping /proc/cpuinfo. > > Ok, but no patch so far doing that, right? 8-)
heh, I've got the idea that you're preparing something ;-)
as for me I've got used to the automatic -jX being added, so I'd prefer we fix that JOBS setup for arm
I'll try to send something ;-)
jirka
| |