lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Apr]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.1-rc1
On 04/23/2015 01:16 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> The binder developers at Samsung have stated that the implementation we
> have here works for their model as well, so I guess that is some kind of
> verification it's not entirely tied to D-Bus. They have plans on
> dropping the existing binder kernel code and using the kdbus code
> instead when it is merged.

Where do things stand wrt LSM hooks for kdbus? I don't see any security
hook calls in the kdbus tree except for the purpose of metadata
collection of process security labels. But nothing for enforcing MAC
over kdbus IPC. binder has a set of security hooks for that purpose, so
it would be a regression wrt MAC enforcement to switch from binder to
kdbus without equivalent checking there.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-04-23 20:01    [W:0.644 / U:0.440 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site