lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Apr]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Is it OK to export symbols 'getname' and 'putname'?
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 10:50:15PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 05:55:07PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > Is that a good idea to export these symbols, given that lustre may be
> > > the only user?
> > Yes, it is a good idea.
>
> It was if lustre was in core code and these idiotic ioctls were something
> we had to live with.
>
> But lustre is in staging code, and we shouldn't export symbols just for
> shitty staging code.
>
> Intead lustre should clean up their mess and get rid of these ioctls
> that do path name lookups.

OK, good point. Thank you!

Regards,
Boqun Feng
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-04-23 07:41    [W:0.061 / U:0.288 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site