Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 23 Apr 2015 13:32:00 +0800 | From | Boqun Feng <> | Subject | Re: Is it OK to export symbols 'getname' and 'putname'? |
| |
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 10:50:15PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 05:55:07PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > > > Is that a good idea to export these symbols, given that lustre may be > > > the only user? > > Yes, it is a good idea. > > It was if lustre was in core code and these idiotic ioctls were something > we had to live with. > > But lustre is in staging code, and we shouldn't export symbols just for > shitty staging code. > > Intead lustre should clean up their mess and get rid of these ioctls > that do path name lookups.
OK, good point. Thank you!
Regards, Boqun Feng [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |