Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 22 Apr 2015 08:43:08 +0530 | From | Preeti U Murthy <> | Subject | Re: [patch 10/39] hrtimer: Use cpu_base->active_base for hotpath iterators |
| |
On 04/21/2015 05:23 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Mon, 20 Apr 2015, Preeti U Murthy wrote: > >> On 04/15/2015 02:38 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >>>> Now that we have the active_bases field in sync we can use it for >> >> This sentence appears a bit ambiguous. I am guessing you are referring >> to what the first patch in this series did, in which case wouldn't it be >> better if it is stated a bit more elaborately like 'Now that it is >> guaranteed that active_bases field will be in sync with the timerqueue >> on the corresponding clock base' ? It took me a while to figure out what >> the statement was referring to. > > Indeed. I'm going to rephrase that.
Thanks.
Reviewed-by: Preeti U. Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > Thanks, > > tglx >
| |