Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 18 Apr 2015 20:49:03 +0200 | From | Greg Kroah-Hartman <> | Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] tee: add OP-TEE driver |
| |
On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 11:36:53AM +0200, Javier González wrote: > Hi,
A: No. Q: Should I include quotations after my reply?
http://daringfireball.net/2007/07/on_top
> We have discussed and implemented an in-kernel interface for the driver. > However, we need to agree on that interface with the kernel submodules that > can be interested in using it (e.g., IMA, keyring). We though it was easier > to have a framework in place before taking this space. This makes sense > since a TEE driver will be, as for today, mostly used by user space. > applications.
No, please provide a "real" solution, just providing a framework that no one uses means that I get to delete it from the kernel tree the next release, and I doubt you want that :)
Please do all of the work here, as odds are, what you need in the end will be different from what you have proposed here.
thanks,
greg k-h
| |