Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 17 Apr 2015 15:45:27 +0200 | From | Greg Kroah-Hartman <> | Subject | Re: [GIT PULL] kdbus for 4.1-rc1 |
| |
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 06:37:45PM +0200, Robert Schwebel wrote: > On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 11:22:18PM +0100, One Thousand Gnomes wrote: > > > The reason that 'everyone who works in this area' adopted is not as much > > > that the design is sound (I'm not arguing whether it is or isn't in this > > > case) as it is that none of them could come up with anything better. > > > > Actually most message passing code uses things like JMS and the various > > MQ libraries. Most IoT uses things other than dbus, small deep embedded > > never uses dbus. > > For what it's worth: we more and more use dbus for small deep embedded > systems, IoT, loosely coupled industrial control applications etc.
Thanks for confirming this, I thought I had seen it used in IoT devices already.
greg k-h
| |