Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 13 Apr 2015 14:39:05 +0200 | From | Luca Abeni <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/8] SCHED_DEADLINE documentation update |
| |
Hi,
On 04/12/2015 11:47 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> here is an update for Documentation/scheduler/sched-deadline.txt. >> Respect to the RFC I sent few days ago, I: >> 1) Split the patches in a better way, (so that, for example, Zhiqiang Zhang's >> authorship is preserved) >> 2) Tried to address all the comments I received on the RFC >> 3) Added another patch, to split Section 3 in various subsections. >> I think it is more readable in this way. Anyway, this is the last patch, >> so it can easily be skipped if people do not like it. >> >> I also split in a separate patch the discussion about the relationship between >> tasks' parameters and SCHED_DEADLINE parameters. This is (I think) the only >> part of the patchset that has not been previously discussed; I decided to >> isolate it in its own patch so that other patches can be applied anyway. > > Note that your Signed-off-by lines are missing. Ops... I knew I was doing something wrong...
> I also noticed the following inconsistency: 'utilization' (and > variants) is spelled in two variants in the text: 'utilization' and > 'utilisation'. > > I'd strongly suggest using 'utilization' et al (american spelling), > because that's how it's spelled in most of the kernel source. Sorry about that... I have ispell configured to use the british dictionary as a default. I think this inconsistency already existed before my patches... So, what should I do? Should I resend the patchset, adding a patch to convert from british to american spelling before my new changes? Or can the patches be committed as they are now, and then I send a follow-up patch to convert the spelling?
In any case, I'll send the new version of the patchset or the follow-up patch (depending on what is the preferred thing) later this week, on Thursday or on Friday (right now I am overloaded with work-related stuff).
Thanks, Luca
| |