Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 10 Apr 2015 16:54:09 +0200 | From | Daniel Borkmann <> | Subject | Re: [BUG/PATCH] kernel RNG and its secrets |
| |
On 04/10/2015 04:50 PM, Stephan Mueller wrote: > Am Freitag, 10. April 2015, 16:46:04 schrieb Daniel Borkmann: > > Hi Daniel, > >> On 04/10/2015 04:36 PM, Stephan Mueller wrote: >>> Am Freitag, 10. April 2015, 16:26:00 schrieb Hannes Frederic Sowa: >> ... >> >>>> I suspected a problem in how volatile with non-present output args could >>>> be different, but this seems not to be the case. >>>> >>>> I would contact llvm/clang mailing list and ask. Maybe there is a >>>> problem? It seems kind of strange to me... >> >> +1 >> >>> Do you really think this is a compiler issue? >> >> If clang/LLVM advertises "GCC compatibility", then this would >> certainly be a different behavior. > > As you wish. I will contact the clang folks. As the proposed fix is not super > urgend, I think we can leave it until I got word from clang.
Okay, that would be good, please let us know.
I believe there's certainly effort in the direction of an official kernel clang/LLVM support, but not officially supported yet. If we could get some clarification on the issue, even better.
| |