Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 09 Mar 2015 13:14:04 -0400 (EDT) | Subject | Re: [PATCH] net: smc91x: improve neponset hack | From | David Miller <> |
| |
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2015 12:34:47 +0000
> On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 12:20:12PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 04:47:06PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> > On Thursday 19 February 2015 00:35:49 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: >> > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 08:47:30PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >> > > > The smc91x driver tries to support multiple platforms at compile >> > > > time, but they are mutually exclusive at runtime, and not clearly >> > > > defined. >> > > >> > > I'd prefer to rework this to fix that properly. From what I remember, >> > > the whole SA11x0 stuff in this driver was a mess. >> > >> > I guess that's reasonable. I've looked through the driver and it seems we >> > did most of the multiplatform work but left a few things alone that should >> > have been converted a long time ago. >> > >> > Can you check if the approach below makes sense to you? >> >> I don't know who's carrying what patches, but this is still broken. >> >> arch/arm/mach-sa1100/neponset.c: In function 'neponset_probe': >> arch/arm/mach-sa1100/neponset.c:271:12: error: 'smc91c_platdata' undeclared (first use in this function) >> drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc91x.c: In function 'smc_drv_probe': >> drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc91x.c:2363:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'machine_has_neponset' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] >> >> This is from building Linus' tree as of Saturday plus arm-soc. >> >> Let's revert all this crap and start again, this time testing it better? > > I'm also getting:
I have the fix in my tree still and is pending to be sent to Linus.
Please be patient.
| |