Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 7 Mar 2015 10:06:21 +0100 | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] watchdog: at91sam9: request the irq with IRQF_NO_SUSPEND |
| |
On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 04:10:16PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > enable_irq_wake() has no effect on IRQF_NO_SUSPEND interrupts, so if the > driver uses IRQF_NO_SUSPEND, it does not need to use enable_irq_wake() > in addition to that.
I still feel we should BUG when someone is calling enable_irq_wake() on an irq with only one desc which has NO_SUSPEND set.
| |