lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Mar]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 5/5] clocksource: sun5i: Add clock notifiers
On 03/04/2015 10:32 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 12:16:57PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 03/03/2015 09:52 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 03:35:41PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>>>>>> +static int sun5i_rate_cb_clksrc(struct notifier_block *nb,
>>>>>> + unsigned long event, void *data)
>>>>>> +{
>>>>>> + struct clk_notifier_data *ndata = data;
>>>>>> + struct sun5i_timer *timer = to_sun5i_timer(nb);
>>>>>> + struct sun5i_timer_clksrc *cs = container_of(timer,
>>>>>> + struct sun5i_timer_clksrc, timer);
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + switch (event) {
>>>>>> + case PRE_RATE_CHANGE:
>>>>>> + clocksource_unregister(&cs->clksrc);
>>>>>> + break;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + case POST_RATE_CHANGE:
>>>>>> + clocksource_register_hz(&cs->clksrc, ndata->new_rate);
>>>>>> + break;
>>>>>
>>>>> Why clocksource_unregister couldn't be in the POST_RATE_CHANGE ?
>>>>
>>>> Wouldn't that leave a (small, I agree) window where the timer would
>>>> run at a rate different to the one it has been registered with?
>>>
>>> Ping?
>>
>> Hi Maxime,
>>
>> except I missed something, there were a couple of comments and I was waiting
>> a V3.
>
> Indeed, but one of these comments (the one above) was still under
> discussion.

Ah, yeah. Fair enough :)



--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-03-04 13:01    [W:0.124 / U:0.384 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site