lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Mar]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH 00/11] an introduction of library operating system for Linux (LibOS)
Am 24.03.2015 um 16:24 schrieb Hajime Tazaki:
> I was thinking that such 'architectural' differences in core
> idea (like system call handling, execution model, process
> context design, etc) is better to have a different architecture
> even if some part of the code is similar.
>
> Isn't it also the same to the other 'hardware-dependent'
> architectures' case like between arm and arm64 ?
>
> of course I'm also happy to share the code between us,
> especially _pure_ userspace part like (virtual) NIC with
> tap or pcap because we also need that part, but we kept such
> code at an external codebase (i.e., linux-libos-tools).

I'd say you should try hard to re-use/integrate your work in arch/um.
With um we already have an architecture which targets userspace,
having two needs a very good justification.

Thanks,
//richard


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-03-24 16:41    [W:0.099 / U:1.384 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site