Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 05 Feb 2015 10:11:31 -0800 | From | Dave Hansen <> | Subject | Re: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4 |
| |
On 02/05/2015 10:08 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote: > --- a/include/trace/events/tlb.h > +++ b/include/trace/events/tlb.h > @@ -13,11 +13,13 @@ > { TLB_LOCAL_SHOOTDOWN, "local shootdown" }, \ > { TLB_LOCAL_MM_SHOOTDOWN, "local mm shootdown" } > > -TRACE_EVENT(tlb_flush, > +TRACE_EVENT_CONDITION(tlb_flush, > > TP_PROTO(int reason, unsigned long pages), > TP_ARGS(reason, pages), > > + TP_CONDITION(cpu_online(smp_processor_id())),
That's a pretty reasonable fix, although it would be nice if the debugging was easier to hit. Did I actually need to be onlining/offlining CPUs to hit the splat that Sedat was reporting?
| |