lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Feb]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: linux-next: Tree for Feb 4
On 02/05/2015 10:08 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> --- a/include/trace/events/tlb.h
> +++ b/include/trace/events/tlb.h
> @@ -13,11 +13,13 @@
> { TLB_LOCAL_SHOOTDOWN, "local shootdown" }, \
> { TLB_LOCAL_MM_SHOOTDOWN, "local mm shootdown" }
>
> -TRACE_EVENT(tlb_flush,
> +TRACE_EVENT_CONDITION(tlb_flush,
>
> TP_PROTO(int reason, unsigned long pages),
> TP_ARGS(reason, pages),
>
> + TP_CONDITION(cpu_online(smp_processor_id())),

That's a pretty reasonable fix, although it would be nice if the
debugging was easier to hit. Did I actually need to be
onlining/offlining CPUs to hit the splat that Sedat was reporting?





\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-02-05 19:21    [W:0.076 / U:0.928 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site