Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 5 Feb 2015 12:12:17 +0100 | Subject | Re: imx_v6_v7_defconfig needs lzop | From | Geert Uytterhoeven <> |
| |
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 03:41:45PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com> wrote: >> > On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven >> > <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote: >> >> http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/12358024/ >> >> >> >> /bin/sh: 1: lzop: not found >> >> cat: write error: Broken pipe >> >> make[3]: *** [arch/arm/boot/compressed/piggy.lzo] Error 1 >> > >> > Isn't this error happening due to the lack of 'lzop' package installed >> > on the host machine? >> >> Indeed. > I guess you don't want to ask for help or report a build breakage, but > question if it's sensible to let a defconfig depend on a host tool that > isn't commonly installed, right?
Right.
The maintainers of the host machines were in the To-header, in the hope they would install the missing tool. The arm people were in the Cc-header, so they can question their defconfig.
Sorry, I should have been clearer from the beginning.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
-- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
| |