Messages in this thread | | | From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] genirq: better describe IRQF_NO_SUSPEND semantics | Date | Sat, 28 Feb 2015 00:04:04 +0100 |
| |
On Friday, February 27, 2015 03:23:13 PM Jonathan Corbet wrote: > On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 23:41:05 +0100 > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote: > > > > Applied (with Peter's ack) to the docs tree. > > > > Well, I've applied it too in the meantime. :-) > > > > Also I'll have more commits on top of it, so it's better if it goes through > > my tree I think, if you don't mind. > > Gee, I feel like I've been here before :) > > In the future, would you like me to avoid taking patches to > Documentation/power?
Well, I tend to apply them as a rule, unless I overlook them. That usually happens if they aren't CCed to me directly or to linux-pm.
But yeah, you can safely avoid patches touching Documentation/power/ or Documentation/acpi/, I'll be taking care of them.
> I'll drop it out of my tree.
Thanks!
-- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
| |