Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v8 7/7] x86, mm: Add set_memory_wt() for WT | From | Toshi Kani <> | Date | Wed, 25 Feb 2015 08:20:01 -0700 |
| |
On Wed, 2015-02-25 at 08:22 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> wrote: > > > +int set_pages_array_wt(struct page **pages, int addrinarray) > > +{ > > + return _set_pages_array(pages, addrinarray, _PAGE_CACHE_MODE_WT); > > +} > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(set_pages_array_wt); > > So by default we make new APIs EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(): we > don't want proprietary modules mucking around with new code > PAT interfaces, we only want modules we can analyze and fix > in detail.
Right. I have one question for this case. This set_pages_array_wt() extends the set_pages_array_xx() family, which are all exported with EXPORT_SYMBOL() today. In this case, should we keep them exported in the consistent manner, or should we still use GPL when adding a new one?
Thanks, -Toshi
| |