lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Feb]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: nios2: is the ptrace ABI correct?
Date
On Tuesday 24 February 2015 00:04:21 Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> So, tried a different approach and removed pt_regs from the UAPI ptrace.h,
> replacing it with a new user_regs that describes how registers are passed
> to user. This however is also problematic, as pt_regs is already used
> by glibc (not really sure what for).
>

I've looked at glibc and could not find a use for pt_regs there. Where
did you find it? It's quite possible that it's incorrect as well
if the structures don't match.

Arnd


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-02-24 10:01    [W:0.230 / U:0.116 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site