Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Arnd Bergmann <> | Subject | Re: Build regressions/improvements in v4.0-rc1 | Date | Mon, 23 Feb 2015 11:24:46 +0100 |
| |
On Monday 23 February 2015 10:14:55 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 10:03 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote: > >> > + /home/kisskb/slave/src/fs/dax.c: error: implicit declaration of function 'copy_user_page' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]: => 266:2 > > > > DAX support was merged with 'depends on !(ARM || MIPS || SPARC)', so I don't > > see how this could happen. > > sh is not ARM, not MIPS, not SPARC, so...?
I misread your email and thought this was still under arm-randconfig.
I checked the other architectures, and found that the same is missing on ARC, so we should add both:
diff --git a/fs/Kconfig b/fs/Kconfig index ec35851e5b71..a24d496787d6 100644 --- a/fs/Kconfig +++ b/fs/Kconfig @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ source "fs/nilfs2/Kconfig" config FS_DAX bool "Direct Access (DAX) support" depends on MMU - depends on !(ARM || MIPS || SPARC) + depends on !(ARC || ARM || MIPS || SH || SPARC) help Direct Access (DAX) can be used on memory-backed block devices. If the block device supports DAX and the filesystem supports DAX,
It's also not implemented on c6x and blackfin, but both of them have MMU=n, so they are already excluded.
> >> sh-randconfig > > >> > + /home/kisskb/slave/src/sound/soc/codecs/max98357a.c: error: implicit declaration of function 'devm_gpiod_get' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]: => 55:2 > >> > + /home/kisskb/slave/src/sound/soc/codecs/max98357a.c: error: implicit declaration of function 'gpiod_direction_output' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]: => 61:2 > >> > + /home/kisskb/slave/src/sound/soc/codecs/max98357a.c: error: implicit declaration of function 'gpiod_set_value' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]: => 30:3 > > > > Something wrong in arch/sh/include/asm/gpio.h? the codec is only > > selectable when gpiolib is enabled, but the consumer.h header > > apparently does not get included here. > > I think it's an bad select, for which a patch has been available since > about 2 weeks.
Ah, right. I was looking at linux-next, which has the fix, so I did not see the problem at first.
Arnd
| |