lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Dec]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: Xen PV guests don't have the rtc_cmos platform device
From
Date
On 12/09/2015 10:27 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 09.12.15 at 16:15, <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> wrote:
>> On 12/09/2015 10:00 AM, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>>> On 2015-12-09 15:42, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>>>> On 09.12.15 at 15:32, <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> wrote:
>>>>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/rtc.c
>>>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/rtc.c
>>>>> @@ -200,6 +200,9 @@ static __init int add_rtc_cmos(void)
>>>>> }
>>>>> #endif
>>>>>
>>>>> + if (paravirt_enabled())
>>>>> + return -ENODEV;
>>>> What about Xen Dom0?
>>>>
>>>> Jan
>>> Checked that in my testing and that still worked:
>>> [ 16.733837] rtc_cmos 00:02: RTC can wake from S4
>>> [ 16.734030] rtc_cmos 00:02: rtc core: registered rtc_cmos as rtc0
>>> [ 16.734087] rtc_cmos 00:02: alarms up to one month, y3k, 114 bytes
>>> nvram
>>> [ 17.760329] rtc_cmos 00:02: setting system clock to 2015-12-09
>>> 08:43:48 UTC (1449650628)
>>>
>>> and /dev/rtc and /dev/rtc0 both exist.
>>>
>>> But i don't know the nitty gritty details about why ...
>>
>> That's because it is discovered by ACPI earlier. I don't know though
>> whether we can always assume this will be the case.
> I don't think we should - Dom0 should (device-wise) behave just
> like a native kernel.

So maybe then this is the case for having a feature flag (probably in
pv_info) that marks which features are paravirtualized.

Vitaly suggested it earlier but I thought we won't have use for it until
we get to HVMlite with variable set of fetures.

-boris



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-12-09 19:41    [W:0.037 / U:0.648 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site