lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Dec]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 0/2] Improve drm_of_component_probe() and move rockchip to use it
On Tue, 22 Dec 2015 17:38:00 +0000
Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 02:22:03PM +0000, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > This is v2 of the patchset trying to make drm_of_component_probe() cope with finding
> > both local crtc ports and remote encoder ones. Heiko Stübner was nice enough to test
> > an earlier version that was patched following Russell's suggestions on rk3288, but
> > I haven't seen any reports from iMX or Armada users.
> >
> > Changelog:
> > v2: Updated the drm_of_component_probe() comment to explain why the reference count
> > is not dropped. Fixed the compare_port() function for rockchip as described by
> > Russell.
> > v1: Original submission. http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2015-November/094546.html
>
> Gentle ping, this has now been tested by Rockchip people and fixes the earlier version
> that had to be reverted in mainline. Can it be included in the -next somewhere?

Hi Liviu,

Sorry for being a bit late.

I wanted to use drm_of_component_probe() for a new DRM driver, but I
could not find any way to do it: you add the "ports" nodes as
components while, usually, the components are the device nodes
themselves.

With this simple patch:

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c
index 493c05c..dbd2921 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ int drm_of_component_probe(struct device *dev,
continue;
}

- component_match_add(dev, &match, compare_of, port);
+ component_match_add(dev, &match, compare_of, port->parent);
of_node_put(port);
}

everything is easy, my DT being like:
de_controller {
...
ports = <&lcd0_p>;
};
lcd_controller {
...
lcd0_p: port {
lcd0_ep: endpoint {
remote-endpoint = <&hdmi_ep>;
};
};
};
What was the reason to keep the "ports" node instead of the device?

--
Ken ar c'hentañ | ** Breizh ha Linux atav! **
Jef | http://moinejf.free.fr/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-12-23 11:01    [W:0.151 / U:0.680 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site