Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 22 Dec 2015 09:50:58 +0100 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2] pinctrl: at91-pio4: use %pr format string for resource | From | Linus Walleij <> |
| |
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 4:29 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote: > On Monday 30 November 2015 09:47:03 Linus Walleij wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote: >> >> > resource_size_t may be defined as 32 or 64 bit depending on configuration, >> > so it cannot be printed using the normal format strings, as gcc correctly >> > warns: >> > >> > pinctrl-at91-pio4.c: In function 'atmel_pinctrl_probe': >> > pinctrl-at91-pio4.c:1003:41: warning: format '%u' expects argument of type 'unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'resource_size_t {aka long long unsigned int}' [-Wformat=] >> > dev_dbg(dev, "bank %i: hwirq=%u\n", i, res->start); >> > >> > This changes the format string to use the special "%pr" format >> > string that prints a resource, and changes the arguments so we >> > the resource structure directly. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> >> > --- >> > v2: don't break ordering of arguments, that part was correct already, unlike >> > what I said in v1. >> >> Patch applied with Ludovic's review tag. > > I don't see this in linux-next, did the commit get lost accidentally?
No, it's just that I screwed up the next branch so many times and Stephen has not been able to pull it into linux-next.
Hope it works now...
Linus Walleij
| |