lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Dec]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: Add brcm,bcm63xx-regulator device tree binding
    From
    On Tue, December 1, 2015 22:16, Mark Brown wrote:
    > On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 08:30:07PM +0000, Simon Arlott wrote:
    >
    >> +- offset: register offset
    >> +- mask: register enable mask
    >> +- startup-delay-us: startup time in microseconds
    >
    > Why are these in the DT, I would expect that if this is a driver for a
    > specific SoC all these properties would be known as a result of that.

    This is a driver for multiple SoCs with the same regulator control in
    different places on different SoCs, so the location of it within the misc
    register needs to be provided in the DT:

    BCM6362:
    #define MISC_BASE 0xb0001800 /* Miscellaneous Registers */
    uint32 miscIddqCtrl; /* 0x48 */

    BCM63268/BCM63168:
    #define MISC_BASE 0xb0001800 /* Miscellaneous Registers */
    uint32 miscIddqCtrl; /* 0x4c */


    I'll remove the startup-delay-us property and put a default in the driver.


    The mask is used as there's one bit per regulator in the register, but
    there's more than one way to express this in the DT:

    It currently looks like this:
    regulators {
    compatible = "simple-bus";
    #address-cells = <0>;
    #size-cells = <0>;

    sar {
    compatible = "brcm,bcm63168-regulator", "brcm,bcm6345-regulator";
    regulator-name = "sar_power";
    regmap = <&misc>;
    offset = <0x4c>;
    mask = <0x1>;
    startup-delay-us = <100000>;
    };

    ipsec {
    compatible = "brcm,bcm63168-regulator", "brcm,bcm6345-regulator";
    regulator-name = "ipsec_power";
    regmap = <&misc>;
    offset = <0x4c>;
    mask = <0x2>;
    startup-delay-us = <100000>;
    };

    ...
    };

    ubus {
    compatible = "brcm,ubus", "simple-bus";
    #address-cells = <1>;
    #size-cells = <1>;
    ranges;

    misc: syscon@10001800 {
    compatible = "syscon";
    reg = <0x10001800 0xd0>;
    };
    };

    Would this be more appropriate?
    regulators {
    compatible = "simple-bus";
    #address-cells = <0>;
    #size-cells = <0>;

    misc_iddq_ctrl {
    compatible = "brcm,bcm63168-regulator", "brcm,bcm6345-regulator";
    regmap = <&misc>;
    offset = <0x4c>;
    #address-cells = <1>;
    #size-cells = <0>;

    sar@0 {
    regulator-name = "sar_power";
    };

    ipsec@1 {
    regulator-name = "ipsec_power";
    };

    ...
    };
    };

    ubus {
    compatible = "brcm,ubus", "simple-bus";
    #address-cells = <1>;
    #size-cells = <1>;
    ranges;

    misc: syscon@10001800 {
    compatible = "syscon";
    reg = <0x10001800 0xd0>;
    };
    };

    --
    Simon Arlott


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2015-12-02 14:01    [W:5.584 / U:0.012 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site