Messages in this thread | | | From | Christophe JAILLET <> | Subject | Re: Source code review around jump label usage | Date | Fri, 11 Dec 2015 19:00:19 +0100 |
| |
Le 11/12/2015 13:08, SF Markus Elfring a écrit : > How does the text length distribution look like for the used jump targets? > > ╔════════╤═══════════╗ > ║ length │ incidence ║ > ╠════════╪═══════════╣ > ║ 1 │ 2 ║ > ║ 2 │ 29 ║ > ║ 3 │ 10640 ║ > ║ 4 │ 3564 ║ > ║ 5 │ 1714 ║ > ║ 6 │ 1162 ║ > ║ 7 │ 1245 ║ > ║ 8 │ 881 ║ > ║ 9 │ 787 ║ > ║ 10 │ 1252 ║ > ║ … │ … ║ > ║ 35 │ 4 ║ > ║ 36 │ 1 ║ > ║ 37 │ 2 ║ > ║ 38 │ 1 ║ > ║ 39 │ 1 ║ > ╚════════╧═══════════╝ >
Maybe having a look at the 1 or 2 chars long labels would make sense. They are likely to be too short for being of any use.
IMHO, too long labels may also reduce readability.
Best regards, CJ
| |