Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 11 Dec 2015 16:15:35 +0100 | From | Boris Brezillon <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 01/58] mtd: nand: denali: add missing nand_release() call in denali_remove() |
| |
Hi Dan,
On Fri, 11 Dec 2015 17:39:47 +0300 Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 02:53:20PM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > Hi Brian, > > > > On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 16:40:08 -0800 > > Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 08:59:45AM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > > > Unregister the NAND device from the NAND subsystem when removing a denali > > > > NAND controller, otherwise the MTD attached to the NAND device is still > > > > exposed by the MTD layer, and accesses to this device will likely crash > > > > the system. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> > > > > Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> #3.8+ > > > > > > Does this follow these rules, from > > > Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt? > > > > > > - It must be obviously correct and tested. > > > > > > - It must fix a real bug that bothers people (not a, "This could be a > > > problem..." type thing). > > > > As you wish, I'll remove those Cc and Fixes tags, or just drop the > > patch if you think it's useless... > > The fixes tag is a separate thing from CCing stable. It's useful on by > itself. I always put the person who wrote the original patch in the To: > header so they can review and comment if I have made a mistake.
Noted. I added back the Fixes tag and added Dinh Nguyen (the commit author) in the loop.
Thanks,
Boris
-- Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com
| |