Messages in this thread | | | From | Måns Rullgård <> | Subject | Re: kdbus refactoring? | Date | Mon, 09 Nov 2015 17:02:45 +0000 |
| |
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> writes:
> On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 3:30 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 10:39:43PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote: >>> On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 10:35 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: >>> > On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 10:06:31PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote: >>> >> Hi all, >>> >> >>> >> after reading on the removal of kdbus from Rawhide[1] I've searched >>> >> the mailinglist archives for more details but didn't find anything. >>> >> So, what are your plans? >>> >> >>> >> [1] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/kernel/2015-October/006011.html >>> > >>> > As that link said, based on the result of the code being in Rawhide, it >>> > is now being reworked / redesigned. The result will be posted for >>> > review "when it's ready". >>> >>> If you rework/redesign something you have to know what you want to change. >>> That's why I was asking for the plan... >> >> Since when do people post "plans" or "design documents" on lkml without >> real code? Again, code will be posted when it's ready, like any other >> kernel submission. > > I ask for feedback on ideas and designs on a fairly regular basis. I > even frequently get valuable feedback :) > > I would like to think that the kernel community would have something > of value to add to the process of designing and implementing a major > new IPC mechanism.
The "trust us, we'll show it when it's ready" attitude reminds me of the controversial TPP and TTIP negotiations.
-- Måns Rullgård mans@mansr.com
| |