lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Nov]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH 08/28] lkl: system call interface and application API
Date
On Tuesday 03 November 2015 22:20:39 Octavian Purdila wrote:
> +
> +/*
> + * Unsupported system calls due to lack of support in LKL (e.g. related to
> + * virtual memory, signal, user processes). We also only support 64bit version
> + * of system calls where we have two version to keep the same APi across 32 and
> + * 64 bit hosts.
> + */
> +#define __NR_restart_syscall 0
> +#define __NR_exit 0
> +#define __NR_fork 0
> +#define __NR_execve 0
> +#define __NR_ptrace 0
> +#define __NR_alarm 0
> +#define __NR_pause 0

Why are these not #undef?

> diff --git a/arch/lkl/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h b/arch/lkl/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..68b5423
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/lkl/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,256 @@
> +#ifndef _ASM_UAPI_LKL_UNISTD_H
> +#define _ASM_UAPI_LKL_UNISTD_H
> +
> +#ifdef __KERNEL__
> +#define __NR_ni_syscall 0
> +#define __NR_reboot 1
> +#endif
> +#define __NR_getpid 2
> +#define __NR_write 3
> +#define __NR_close 4
> +#define __NR_unlink 5
> +#define __NR_open 6
> +#define __NR_poll 7

Could you use the standard numbers from include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h?
Maybe include that header and then #undef the ones you don't support?
That would avoid having to assign a new number of each future syscall
that gets added.

Arnd


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-11-08 00:41    [W:0.274 / U:0.588 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site