lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Nov]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH V15 00/11] x86: Intel Cache Allocation Technology Support
On Wed, 4 Nov 2015, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Nov 2015 15:57:41 +0100 (CET)
> Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 4 Nov 2015, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 1 Oct 2015 23:09:34 -0700
> > > Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > This series has some preparatory patches and Intel cache allocation
> > > > support.
> > >
> > > Ping? What's the status of this series?
> >
> > We still need to agree on the user space interface which is the
> > hardest part of it....
>
> My understanding is that two interfaces have been proposed: the cgroups
> one and an API based on syscalls or ioctls.
>
> Are those proposals mutual exclusive? What about having the cgroups one
> merged IFF it's useful, and having the syscall API later if really
> needed?
>
> I don't want to make the wrong decision, but the cgroups interface is
> here. Holding it while we discuss a perfect interface that doesn't
> even exist will just do a bad service for users.

Well, no. We do not just introduce a random user space ABI simply
because we have to support it forever.

Thanks,

tglx



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-11-04 16:41    [W:7.455 / U:0.016 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site