Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 29 Nov 2015 22:28:59 +0100 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/3] ste_dma40: Delete another unnecessary check in d40_probe() | From | Linus Walleij <> |
| |
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 10:24 PM, SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net> > Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 21:56:07 +0100 > > A single jump label was used by the d40_probe() function in several cases > for error handling which was a bit inefficient here. > > * This implementation detail could be improved by the introduction > of another jump label. > > * Remove an extra check for the variable "base". > > * Omit its explicit initialisation at the beginning then. > > Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Yours, Linus Walleij
| |