Messages in this thread | | | From | Bharat Kumar Gogada <> | Subject | RE: [PATCH v9] PCI: Xilinx-NWL-PCIe: Added support for Xilinx NWL PCIe Host Controller | Date | Thu, 26 Nov 2015 05:03:20 +0000 |
| |
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v9] PCI: Xilinx-NWL-PCIe: Added support for Xilinx NWL > PCIe Host Controller > > On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 05:40:49 +0000 > Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharat.kumar.gogada@xilinx.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, 19 Nov 2015 11:05:23 +0530 > > > Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharat.kumar.gogada@xilinx.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Adding PCIe Root Port driver for Xilinx PCIe NWL bridge IP. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharatku@xilinx.com> > > > > Signed-off-by: Ravi Kiran Gummaluri <rgummal@xilinx.com> > > > > Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> > > > > --- > > > > + > > > > +#define MSI_ADDRESS 0xDEED0000 > > > > > > How did you pick this value? What if it intersect with some actual RAM? > > > What if a device actually does DMA to that location? > > > > > > Wouldn't it make sense to actually pick a real *device* address (hint: > > > your MSI controller itself) for this purpose, as the device will > > > never DMA there? > > > > > > > > We have already mentioned in previous patch discussion, we don't have > > any device address on our SOC for MSI, that's the reason we are > > allocating a page for MSI in RAM. Since our memory write is consumed > > by bridge and doesn't write to memory, you suggested to use some > > random address, so using some random address. > > This is becoming painful. > > - "write is consumed by bridge and doesn't write to memory": So why are > you using something that has a chance of actually being memory??? Are > you in the business of corrupting unsuspecting data? > > - "we don't have any device address on our SOC for MSI": You have > plenty, and that's the whole of your device space. *All of it*. So > just take the base address of your PCIe controller, and be done with > it. Or your UART. Anything that cannot be DMA'ed to from a PCIe > device, and that is downstream of your PCIe bridge. > Yes, PCIe controller base will be fine, will send next patch addressing this.
| |