lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Nov]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [kbuild-all] [PATCH] locking_selftest: Save/restore migrate_disable_atomic in locking selftest
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 03:35:11PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 11/23/2015 03:14 PM, Fengguang Wu wrote:
>
> >> Need to add RT in the subject like "[PATCH RT]". Then perhaps Fengguang
> >> can have his tests either ignore these or test against the -rt trees.
> >
> > Yes sure. Shall I apply RT patches to this tree/branch?
> >
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rt/linux-rt-devel.git linux-4.1.y-rt
>
> I'm going to get you your kbot branch where you run bisect tests and
> everything and tests the patches against. The problem with this one is
> that we will drop it (or leave it stale) once we move to the next major
> kernel release.

Thanks! Yes, a stable branch name would be better than "linux-4.1.y-rt"
that's like to become stable over time.

Thanks,
Fengguang


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-11-23 16:21    [W:2.713 / U:0.936 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site