Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 23 Nov 2015 23:03:03 +0800 | From | Fengguang Wu <> | Subject | Re: [kbuild-all] [PATCH] locking_selftest: Save/restore migrate_disable_atomic in locking selftest |
| |
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 03:35:11PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > On 11/23/2015 03:14 PM, Fengguang Wu wrote: > > >> Need to add RT in the subject like "[PATCH RT]". Then perhaps Fengguang > >> can have his tests either ignore these or test against the -rt trees. > > > > Yes sure. Shall I apply RT patches to this tree/branch? > > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rt/linux-rt-devel.git linux-4.1.y-rt > > I'm going to get you your kbot branch where you run bisect tests and > everything and tests the patches against. The problem with this one is > that we will drop it (or leave it stale) once we move to the next major > kernel release.
Thanks! Yes, a stable branch name would be better than "linux-4.1.y-rt" that's like to become stable over time.
Thanks, Fengguang
| |