lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Nov]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 5/5] arm: boot: store ATAGs structure into DT "/chosen/linux,atags" entry
On Sunday 22 November 2015 07:51:46 Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Wed 2015-11-11 17:10:46, Frank Rowand wrote:
> > Adding devicetree list.
> >
> > Thread starts at
> > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-July/354459.html
> >
> > On 11/5/2015 8:17 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > * Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@gmail.com> [151105 03:41]:
> > >> On Tuesday 13 October 2015 16:37:46 Pali Rohár wrote:
> > >>> On Monday 12 October 2015 13:45:09 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > >>>> * Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@gmail.com> [151012 13:29]:
> > >>>>> On Monday 12 October 2015 22:16:40 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Pali, any news on posting an updated series with the comments
> > >>>>>> addressed in this thread? It seems that we all pretty much agree
> > >>>>>> what needs to be done.
> >
> > I'm not real happy with the concept of patches 4 and 5 in this series.
> > My concern is that those two patches are using the FDT as a transport
> > mechanism for a binary blob (the atags object).
>
> Umm. Ok. Do you have alternative proposal that works for everyone?
>
> I mean. This discussion was going for quite a long time, and it would
> be nice to have some solution... patch proposal... something.
> Pavel

Yes, discussion is going for a long time! So should I spend time for
adding documentation to my solution (this is last one thing which is
missing)? Or my solution is wrong and somebody else will propose new?
I do not want to spend time on something which will be rejected and
discarded.

--
Pali Rohár
pali.rohar@gmail.com


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-11-23 16:01    [W:1.972 / U:0.040 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site