Messages in this thread | | | From | Rob Herring <> | Date | Mon, 2 Nov 2015 09:13:17 -0600 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/3] PM / OPP: Add "opp-supported-hw" binding |
| |
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 9:20 PM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote: > On 30-10-15, 15:18, Stephen Boyd wrote: >> A side-note. I wonder if it would be better style to have the >> node name be: >> >> opp@600000000 { > > I thought the @... had a special meaning and we might end up creating > some device for the node then? Perhaps I am mistaken.
There is no special meaning, just convention which is the unit-address should match the reg property address. I'm okay with an exception here.
Rob
| |