lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Nov]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] KVM: x86: don't expose syscall/sysret to intel 32-bit guest
From
Date


On 19/11/2015 13:01, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> > This is not correct. As far as I know, the SYSCALL bit is always
> > present in CPUID, even if the machine is running in 32-bit mode; CPUID
> > documentation (SDM Volume 2) explicitly documents bit 11 as "Bit 11:
> > SYSCALL/SYSRET available in 64-bit mode".
>
> No, I try a 32-bit linux host kernel, cpuid tool shows that SYSCALL
> bit is not set.

Ok, let me try...

Paolo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-11-19 13:21    [W:0.053 / U:0.532 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site