lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Nov]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/3] ARM: dts: enable clock support for Broadcom NSP
From
Date
Would this patch merge properly with the other NSP DT clean up patch + 
I2C DT patch that you worked out internally but have not sent out?

I thought it's going to make the maintainers' life easier if you can
group DT changes per platform and send them out in the same series.

I also have some inline comments below.

On 11/18/2015 3:13 PM, Jon Mason wrote:
> Replace current device tree dummy clocks with real clock support for
> Broadcom Northstar Plus SoC
>
> Signed-off-by: Jon Mason <jonmason@broadcom.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm-nsp.dtsi | 99 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 75 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm-nsp.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm-nsp.dtsi
> index 4bcdd28..f85a4f1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm-nsp.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm-nsp.dtsi
> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
>
> #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
> #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
> +#include <dt-bindings/clock/bcm-nsp.h>
>
> #include "skeleton.dtsi"
>
> @@ -42,7 +43,7 @@
>
> mpcore {
> compatible = "simple-bus";
> - ranges = <0x00000000 0x19020000 0x00003000>;
> + ranges = <0x00000000 0x19000000 0x00023000>;

Why does this have anything to do with clocks? Shouldn't it be a
separate patch?

> #address-cells = <1>;
> #size-cells = <1>;
>
> @@ -58,32 +59,23 @@
> };
> };
>
> - L2: l2-cache {
> - compatible = "arm,pl310-cache";
> - reg = <0x2000 0x1000>;
> - cache-unified;
> - cache-level = <2>;
> - };
> -
> - gic: interrupt-controller@19021000 {
> - compatible = "arm,cortex-a9-gic";
> - #interrupt-cells = <3>;
> - #address-cells = <0>;
> - interrupt-controller;
> - reg = <0x1000 0x1000>,
> - <0x0100 0x100>;
> + a9pll: arm_clk@19000000 {
> + #clock-cells = <0>;
> + compatible = "brcm,nsp-armpll";
> + clocks = <&osc>;
> + reg = <0x00000 0x1000>;
> };
>
> timer@19020200 {
> compatible = "arm,cortex-a9-global-timer";
> - reg = <0x0200 0x100>;
> + reg = <0x20200 0x100>;
> interrupts = <GIC_PPI 11 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> clocks = <&periph_clk>;
> };
>
> twd-timer@19020600 {
> compatible = "arm,cortex-a9-twd-timer";
> - reg = <0x0600 0x20>;
> + reg = <0x20600 0x20>;
> interrupts = <GIC_PPI 13 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(2) |
> IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH)>;
> clocks = <&periph_clk>;
> @@ -91,11 +83,27 @@
>
> twd-watchdog@19020620 {
> compatible = "arm,cortex-a9-twd-wdt";
> - reg = <0x0620 0x20>;
> + reg = <0x20620 0x20>;
> interrupts = <GIC_PPI 14 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(2) |
> IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH)>;
> clocks = <&periph_clk>;
> };
> +
> + gic: interrupt-controller@19021000 {
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a9-gic";
> + #interrupt-cells = <3>;
> + #address-cells = <0>;
> + interrupt-controller;
> + reg = <0x21000 0x1000>,
> + <0x20100 0x100>;
> + };
> +
> + L2: l2-cache {
> + compatible = "arm,pl310-cache";
> + reg = <0x22000 0x1000>;
> + cache-unified;
> + cache-level = <2>;
> + };

From here and above, all labels are wrong. You are moving them into a
bus that has translated bus addresses, but you still use absolute
addresses for all labels.

And again, 1) Why is this change imbedded in a patch meant for adding DT
clock support according to the commit message; 2) how does the
dependency work with the other patches that you are about to send out?


> };
>
> clocks {
> @@ -103,10 +111,34 @@
> #size-cells = <1>;
> ranges;
>
> - periph_clk: periph_clk {
> + osc: oscillator {
> + #clock-cells = <0>;
> compatible = "fixed-clock";
> + clock-frequency = <25000000>;
> + };
> +
> + iprocmed: iprocmed {
> + #clock-cells = <0>;
> + compatible = "fixed-factor-clock";
> + clocks = <&genpll BCM_NSP_GENPLL_IPROCFAST_CLK>;
> + clock-div = <2>;
> + clock-mult = <1>;
> + };
> +
> + iprocslow: iprocslow {
> + #clock-cells = <0>;
> + compatible = "fixed-factor-clock";
> + clocks = <&genpll BCM_NSP_GENPLL_IPROCFAST_CLK>;
> + clock-div = <4>;
> + clock-mult = <1>;
> + };
> +
> + periph_clk: periph_clk {
> #clock-cells = <0>;
> - clock-frequency = <500000000>;
> + compatible = "fixed-factor-clock";
> + clocks = <&a9pll>;
> + clock-div = <2>;
> + clock-mult = <1>;
> };
> };
>
> @@ -118,17 +150,17 @@
>
> uart0: serial@18000300 {
> compatible = "ns16550a";
> - reg = <0x0300 0x100>;
> + reg = <0x000300 0x100>;
> interrupts = <GIC_SPI 85 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> - clock-frequency = <62499840>;
> + clocks = <&osc>;
> status = "disabled";
> };
>
> uart1: serial@18000400 {
> compatible = "ns16550a";
> - reg = <0x0400 0x100>;
> + reg = <0x000400 0x100>;
> interrupts = <GIC_SPI 85 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> - clock-frequency = <62499840>;
> + clocks = <&osc>;
> status = "disabled";
> };
>
> @@ -217,5 +249,24 @@
>
> brcm,nand-has-wp;
> };
> +
> + lcpll0: lcpll0@1803f100 {

wrong label

> + #clock-cells = <1>;
> + compatible = "brcm,nsp-lcpll0";
> + reg = <0x03f100 0x14>;
> + clocks = <&osc>;
> + clock-output-names = "lcpll0", "pcie_phy", "sdio",
> + "ddr_phy";
> + };
> +
> + genpll: genpll@1803f140 {

wrong label

> + #clock-cells = <1>;
> + compatible = "brcm,nsp-genpll";
> + reg = <0x03f140 0x24>;
> + clocks = <&osc>;
> + clock-output-names = "genpll", "phy", "ethernetclk",
> + "usbclk", "iprocfast", "sata1",
> + "sata2";
> + };
> };
> };
>


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-11-19 01:21    [W:0.073 / U:0.108 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site