lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Nov]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 02/13] dmaengine: Introduce dma_request_slave_channel_compat_reason()
    From
    On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 5:51 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
    > On Wednesday 18 November 2015 17:43:04 Andy Shevchenko wrote:
    >> >
    >> > I assume that the sst-firmware.c case is a mistake, it should just use a
    >> > plain DMA_SLAVE and not DMA_MEMCPY.
    >>
    >> Other way around.
    >>
    >
    > Ok, I see. In that case I guess it also shouldn't call
    > dmaengine_slave_config(), right? I don't think that's valid
    > on a MEMCPY channel.

    Hmm… That's right, though I suspect still one thing why it's done this
    way. Let's ask Vinod and Liam about that.

    --
    With Best Regards,
    Andy Shevchenko


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2015-11-18 17:21    [W:4.236 / U:0.236 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site