Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 17 Nov 2015 03:41:35 +0100 | Subject | Re: Routing loops & TTL tracking with tunnel devices | From | "Jason A. Donenfeld" <> |
| |
Hi Eric,
On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 11:28 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote: > There is very little chance we'll accept a new member in sk_buff, unless > proven needed.
I actually have no intention of doing this! I'm wondering if there already is a member in sk_buff that moonlights as my desired ttl counter, or if there's another mechanism for avoiding routing loops. I want to work with what's already there, rather than meddling with the innards of important and memory sensitive structures such as sk_buff.
| |