lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Nov]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH RFC] ioctl based CAT interface
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 03:27:40PM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 05:51:00PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 02:39:33PM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > > + * * one tcrid entry can be in different locations
> > > + * in different sockets.
> >
> > NAK on that without cpuset integration.
> >
> > I do not want freely migratable tasks having radically different
> > performance profiles depending on which CPU they land.
>
> Please expand on what "cpuset integration" means, operationally.
> I hope it does not mean "i prefer cgroups as an interface",
> because that does not mean much to me.
>
> So you are saying this should be based on cgroups? Have you seen the
> cgroups proposal and the issues with it, that have been posted?

Subject: cat cgroup interface proposal (non hierarchical) was Re: [PATCH
V15 00/11] x86: Intel Cache
Allocation Technology Support


https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/11/2/700




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-11-13 19:01    [W:0.094 / U:1.304 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site