Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 13 Nov 2015 16:06:17 +0100 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] thermal: rcar_thermal: use pm_runtime_put_sync() | From | Ulf Hansson <> |
| |
On 12 November 2015 at 19:43, Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 09:04:09AM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote: >> > >> > OK >> > >> > If we did that, all devices that had just been unbound from their drivers >> > and had runtime PM disabled after that would be set to "suspended" by the >> > core, right? >> >> Yes, that's the idea. I will send a patch we can test. >> >> > >> > If that helps, I don't really have objections. > > Given this discussion, > > Is this series of two patches on this thermal driver still applicable?
I think patch1 is different, it's a cleanup patch (I just replied to it separately).
As for subject patch, I think we agreed upon that it's a workaround but I don't have strong opinion if you want to pick it up anyway.
On the other hand the change won't be needed *if* we solve problem via driver core. I intend to send a patch for this on Monday, keep you on cc.
Kind regards Uffe
| |