lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Nov]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 4/4] locking: Introduce smp_cond_acquire()
On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 05:39:40PM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:

> Just be curious, should spin_unlock_wait() semantically be an ACQUIRE?

I did wonder the same thing, it would simplify a number of things if
this were so.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-11-11 13:41    [W:0.109 / U:1.788 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site