Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 17/17] scsi: ufs-qcom: fix compilation warnings | From | Stephen Boyd <> | Date | Tue, 27 Oct 2015 11:52:05 -0700 |
| |
On 10/27/2015 11:22 AM, ygardi@codeaurora.org wrote: >> On 10/27/2015 03:10 AM, ygardi@codeaurora.org wrote: >>>> On 10/26/2015 08:41 AM, Yaniv Gardi wrote: >>>>> Tnis patch fixes the following compilation warnings: >>>>> ...ufs-qcom.c:1201:40: >>>>> warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) >>>>> ...ufs-qcom.c:1201:40: >>>>> expected void const *ptr >>>>> ...ufs-qcom.c:1201:40: >>>>> got void [noderef] <asn:2>*dev_ref_clk_ctrl_mmio >>>>> ...ufs-qcom.c:1207:53: >>>>> warning: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) >>>>> ...ufs-qcom.c:1207:53: >>>>> expected void const *ptr >>>>> ...ufs-qcom.c:1207:53: >>>>> got void [noderef] <asn:2>*dev_ref_clk_ctrl_mmio >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Yaniv Gardi <ygardi@codeaurora.org> >>>>> >>>>> --- >>>> What version of sparse do you use? You shouldn't need to do this. >>>> >>> i just updated my sparse to the newest - >>> so i'm using sparse 0.4.4 >>> and the command i use is: >>> make ARCH=arm C=1 CF="-Wsparse-all" >>> and i still get all the warnings. >>> with my patch, the are no warnings. >>> >> That is not the latest version of sparse. I'm not sure when sparse was >> updated, but I have the git version which shows v0.5.0-51-ga53cea28f0db >> > Stephen, is this something you insist on? > i think the patch can stay as it is. > please let me know, as i wouldn't like this issue to block the entire patch >
Yes. Adding __force is wrong. Just drop this patch.
-- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
| |