Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 3/3] sched: Implement interface for cgroup unified hierarchy | From | Mike Galbraith <> | Date | Tue, 27 Oct 2015 06:56:42 +0100 |
| |
On Tue, 2015-10-27 at 14:46 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 06:42:11AM +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > Sure, sounds fine, I just fervently hope that the below is foul swamp > > gas having nothing what so ever to do with your definition of "saner". > > lol, idk, you keep taking things in weird directions. Let's just stay > technical, okay? > > > http://www.linuxfoundation.org/news-media/blogs/browse/2013/08/all-about-linux-kernel-cgroup%E2%80%99s-redesign > > > > http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/ControlGroupInterface/ > > > > I'm not into begging. I really don't want to have to ask anyone to > > pretty please do for me what I can currently do all by my little self > > without having to give a rats ass less whether what I want to do fits in > > the world view of this or that obnoxious little control freak. > > Well, if you think certain things are being missed, please speak up. > Not in some media campaign way but with technical reasoning and > justifications.
Inserting a middle-man is extremely unlikely to improve performance.
-Mike
| |