Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 13 Oct 2015 17:08:58 +0530 | From | Alim Akhtar <> | Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH] phy: exynos-ufs: exynos_ufs_phy_calibrate() can be static |
| |
HI How I am support to handle this patch? Should I just fix these warnings in my patch or I just add this as a separate patch on the top of the series?
On 10/01/2015 04:34 PM, kbuild test robot wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> > --- > phy-exynos-ufs.c | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-exynos-ufs.c b/drivers/phy/phy-exynos-ufs.c > index 343fcaf..835ee78 100644 > --- a/drivers/phy/phy-exynos-ufs.c > +++ b/drivers/phy/phy-exynos-ufs.c > @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ static bool match_cfg_to_pwr_mode(u8 desc, u8 required_pwr) > return false; > } > > -int exynos_ufs_phy_calibrate(struct phy *phy, enum phy_cfg_tag tag, u8 pwr) > +static int exynos_ufs_phy_calibrate(struct phy *phy, enum phy_cfg_tag tag, u8 pwr) > { > struct exynos_ufs_phy *ufs_phy = get_exynos_ufs_phy(phy); > struct exynos_ufs_phy_cfg **cfgs = ufs_phy->cfg; > @@ -93,14 +93,14 @@ out: > return 0; > } > > -void exynos_ufs_phy_set_lane_cnt(struct phy *phy, u8 lane_cnt) > +static void exynos_ufs_phy_set_lane_cnt(struct phy *phy, u8 lane_cnt) > { > struct exynos_ufs_phy *ufs_phy = get_exynos_ufs_phy(phy); > > ufs_phy->lane_cnt = lane_cnt; > } > > -int exynos_ufs_phy_wait_for_lock_acq(struct phy *phy) > +static int exynos_ufs_phy_wait_for_lock_acq(struct phy *phy) > { > struct exynos_ufs_phy *ufs_phy = get_exynos_ufs_phy(phy); > const unsigned int timeout_us = 100000; >
| |