Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 9 Jan 2015 07:58:48 +0100 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/3] gpio: dln2: use bus_sync_unlock instead of scheduling work | From | Linus Walleij <> |
| |
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 12:40 AM, Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@intel.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 1, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Octavian Purdila >> <octavian.purdila@intel.com> wrote: >> >>> Use the irq_chip bus_sync_unlock method to update hardware registers >>> instead of scheduling work from the mask/unmask methods. This simplifies >>> a bit the driver and make it more uniform with the other GPIO IRQ >>> drivers. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@intel.com> >> >> Patch applied for fixes. >> > > Hi Linus, > > I don't see the patch applied, could you please consider it for the > -for-next branch?
Ah sorry I thought only the first patch was a critical fix. Applied this to fixes too now. Working on queueing the GPIO fixes.
Yours, Linus Walleij
| |