Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 08 Jan 2015 23:09:03 +0530 | From | Pratyush Anand <> | Subject | Re: [RFC 2/8] ARM64: Refactor kprobes-arm64 |
| |
On Thursday 08 January 2015 11:06 PM, Will Deacon wrote: > On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 05:33:08PM +0000, Pratyush Anand wrote: >> On Thursday 08 January 2015 10:25 PM, Will Deacon wrote: >>> On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 03:21:18PM +0000, Pratyush Anand wrote: >>>> Most of the stuff of kprobes-arm64.c can also be used by uprobes.c. So >>>> move all those part to common code area. In the process rename kprobe to >>>> probe whereever possible. >>>> >>>> No functional change. >>> >>> In which case, can you merge this into the kprobes series (which we haven't >>> merged yet)? >>> >> >> Yes, thats why these are just RFCs. I will send next version of uprobe >> only after kprobe patches are accepted into maintainer's tree. > > Ok, but it also makes sense to make kprobes refactoring changes *before* the > patches are merged, as that reduces churn in mainline whilst you don't have > any other dependencies. >
Sure, Sure.. I too expect first two patches to be merged with kprobe series. I just did that to develop my uprobe code.
~Pratyush
> Will >
| |