lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Jan]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH tip/core/rcu 09/14] rcu: Don't initiate RCU priority boosting on root rcu_node
Date
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Because there is no longer any preempted tasks on the root rcu_node, and
because there is no longer ever an rcub kthread for the root rcu_node,
this commit drops the code in force_qs_rnp() that attempts to awaken
the non-existent root rcub kthread. This is strictly a performance
enhancement, removing a root rcu_node ->lock acquisition and release
along with some tests in rcu_initiate_boost(), ending with the test that
notes that there is no rcub kthread.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
kernel/rcu/tree.c | 6 ------
1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 990b406faf4e..5a0a4c969d38 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -2513,12 +2513,6 @@ static void force_qs_rnp(struct rcu_state *rsp,
}
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
}
- rnp = rcu_get_root(rsp);
- if (rnp->qsmask == 0) {
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags);
- smp_mb__after_unlock_lock();
- rcu_initiate_boost(rnp, flags); /* releases rnp->lock. */
- }
}

/*
--
1.8.1.5


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-01-07 19:21    [W:0.190 / U:1.196 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site