lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Jan]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v13 0/6] Per-user clock constraints
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 10:41 PM, Tomeu Vizoso
<tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com> wrote:
> On 01/29/2015 03:26 AM, Mike Turquette wrote:
>> Quoting Tomeu Vizoso (2015-01-27 22:59:59)
>>> On 01/27/2015 01:55 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>>> On 01/23/15 03:03, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> in this v13 I have:
>>>>>
>>>>> * added the latest R-b tags from Stephen,
>>>>>
>>>>> * split some lines that went over the 80-char limit,
>>>>>
>>>>> * made explicit in the docs that the range limits are inclusive, and
>>>>>
>>>>> * removed an ifdef in clkdev.c by adding a dev_id param to __of_clk_get_by_name.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I think this patch series is ready to go except for the last one? Do you
>>>> plan on polishing that one some more?
>>>
>>> Hi Mike,
>>>
>>> do you plan to merge this for 3.20?
>>
>> Tomeu,
>>
>> Yes. I have taken patches 1-5.
>>
>> I edited patch #3 to adapt clk_has_parent for struct clk_core.
>>
>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/clk/linux.git/commit/?h=clk-next&id=59cf3fcf9bafe8fdb6183f13dafb81fc8213a8f9
>>
>> Patch #4 need an update to convert sun6i_ahb1_clk_determine_rate to have
>> min/max rates.
>>
>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/clk/linux.git/commit/?h=clk-next&id=cb75a8fcd14e71c115decc416dd8d223e7c8b2e0
>>
>> Can you look it over and make sure I didn't screw anything up?
>
> Yup, they look good to me. I have also done some testing here.

Great! Thanks again for your hard work on this series.

Regards,
Mike

>
> Thanks,
>
> Tomeu
>


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-01-29 15:41    [W:0.062 / U:0.944 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site