Messages in this thread | | | From | "Yang, Wenyou" <> | Subject | RE: [PATCH v4 00/13] AT91 pm cleanup for 3.20 | Date | Wed, 28 Jan 2015 09:12:07 +0000 |
| |
Hi Sylvain,
> -----Original Message----- > From: Sylvain Rochet [mailto:sylvain.rochet@finsecur.com] > Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 5:06 PM > To: Yang, Wenyou > Cc: Ferre, Nicolas; linux@arm.linux.org.uk; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com; > peda@axentia.se; sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com; linux@maxim.org.za > Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/13] AT91 pm cleanup for 3.20 > > Hello Wenyou, > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 09:59:13AM +0100, Sylvain Rochet wrote: > > Hello Wenyou, > > > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 09:39:32AM +0800, Wenyou Yang wrote: > > > Hi Nicolas, > > > > > > This version is rebased on the branch: at91-3.20-cleanup of the repository > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nferre/linux-at91.git > > > > > > It is purpose to clean up the PM code, includes the patches from Peter Rosin > and Sylvain Rochet. > > > > > > Since verifying the USB clock and USB PLL disabling before > > > suspending to memory, it aslo depends on the following patch serials from > Sylvain: > > > [PATCHv6 0/5] USB: gadget: atmel_usba_udc: Driver improvements > > > [PATCHv7 0/6] USB: host: Atmel OHCI and EHCI drivers improvements > > > > > > Removes CONFIG_AT91_SLOW_CLOCK config item to simply the PM config, > > > The suspend to standby mode uses the same sram function as the suspend to > memory mode. > > > Remove some unused code. > > > > > > Alexandr & Sylvain, Thank you very much for so many feedbacks. > > > > > > Changes in v2: > > > - Rebase on the at91-3.20-cleanup branch > > > - Recover the verify clock condition, only for suspend to memory. > > > - Collect ACK from Alexandre > > > - Add the macro for PM mode > > > > > > Changes in v3: > > > - Clear unused state argument in at91_pm_verify_clocks() > > > - Remove pr_info("AT91:... slow_clock ? ..") in patch 07/13. > > > > Changes in v4: ? :-)
Yes, I am not careful.
Can I resend?
> > Actually, I guess it is: > > Changes in v2: > - Rebase on the at91-3.20-cleanup branch > - Recover the verify clock condition, only for suspend to memory. > - Collect ACK from Alexandre > - Add the macro for PM mode > > Changes in v3 > - Sylvain splits the patch in two > - Add handling if no sram allocated for PM > - Retain the STANDBY and SUSPEND_MEM select in at91_pm_enter. > > Changes in v4: > - Clear unused state argument in at91_pm_verify_clocks() > - Remove pr_info("AT91:... slow_clock ? ..") in patch 07/13. > > > (I prefer the reverse order, but, details) > > Sylvain
Best Regards, Wenyou Yang
| |