lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2015]   [Jan]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] ARM: dts: re-fromat AT91 part to match other entries
Date
On Wednesday 14 January 2015 00:47:59 Alexandre Belloni wrote:
>
> On 13/01/2015 at 15:09:56 -0800, Olof Johansson wrote :
> > On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 03:43:00PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> > > The entries are separated as ARM V4/V5 and ARM V7 as some other per-SoC config
> > > options may be removed in the near future.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
> > > ---
> > > Hi Olof,
> > >
> > > This is an attempt to match other ARM SoC families format.
> > > If you feel that the patch can be good, do not hesitate to take it yourself. I
> > > don't plan to integrate it in any of my pull-request so it can appear quickly in
> > > arm-soc and can be used by everyone.
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > If you see what Peter did, he split up the rules per-SoC based on how
> > things were selectable in Kconfig. Since you seem to have the Kconfig
> > entries already, how about doing the same? That way the same information
> > w.r.t. SoC family that you have as comments isn't lost either.
> >
>
> You didn't see the patch set yet because it depends on a lot of other
> series still being discussed but after the switch to multiplatform, the
> only config option left will be SOC_AT91RM9200, SOC_AT91SAM9 (both
> under SOC_SAM_V4_V5) and SOC_SAMA5, under SOC_SAM_V7.
>
> That's our plan, unless you feel that we should keep one config option
> per SoC.

With the patches that I prepared last year, all of AT91SAM9 becomes
one small file, so there really isn't any need to have separate Kconfig
options.

Arnd


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2015-01-14 10:21    [W:0.097 / U:0.008 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site